Do you know about the most controversial scientific experiment conducted by Stanford University? The Stanford Prison Experiment, conducted by psychologist Philip Zimbardo, attempted to enhance the understanding of human behavior limits by subjecting college students to an experience of living in a simulated prison. What started as a simple role-playing exercise turned into a turbulent six-day journey that explored scenes of authority, cruelty, and psychological upheaval.

This groundbreaking experiment aimed to probe the limits of human behavior by simulating a prison environment. Initially designed as a two-week study, it quickly spiraled into a tumultuous six-day odyssey, revealing the complexities of human nature, authority dynamics, and the psychological impacts of role-playing.

A cohort of college students volunteered for this experiment, assuming roles as either guards or prisoners within a simulated prison set up in the basement of the psychology department at Stanford University. What began as a role-playing exercise swiftly transformed into a harrowing ordeal, showcasing the power of situational contexts on individual behavior.

The guards, assigned their roles of authority, swiftly adopted authoritarian behavior, inflicting mental distress, enforcing strict rules, and subjecting prisoners to humiliation. The swift transformation showcased how individuals, even in a contrived setting, embraced and internalized roles with alarming consequences.

Conversely, the students designated as prisoners faced emotional distress and a sense of helplessness. Their resistance against oppressive conditions led to heightened unrest and a brewing sense of rebellion within the simulated prison, illustrating the mental and emotional toll imposed by their roles.

The experiment’s abrupt halt came as the situation escalated beyond control, breaching ethical boundaries. The distress experienced by the prisoners necessitated intervention from external authorities, leading real law enforcement officers to terminate the experiment to restore order.

While the Stanford Prison Experiment remains controversial due to its ethical implications and methodology, it serves as a milestone in comprehending the intricacies of human behavior. It highlighted how situational factors in a simulated oppressive environment influence individual actions, igniting debates about the ethical boundaries and validity of psychological experiments involving human subjects.

This experiment remains a critical case study, shedding light on the profound impact of social roles and power dynamics on human behavior. Despite its controversies, it stands as a testament to the complexities of human behavior under simulated oppressive conditions.

Next: Decoding DNA to Reconstruct Faces


  • Zimbardo, Philip G., Craig Haney, W. Curtis Banks, and David Jaffe. “The Stanford prison experiment.” (1971). [Paper]
  • Zimbardo, Philip G., Christina Maslach, and Craig Haney. “Reflections on the Stanford prison experiment: Genesis, transformations, consequences.” In Obedience to authority, pp. 207-252. Psychology Press, 1999. [Paper]

By The Research Mind

We, researchers from the University of Oxford and University of Cambridge, are dedicated to sharing the latest updates, breakthroughs, and even the occasional blunders in Science & Technology. Stay tuned for some truly mind-blowing science experiments!

One thought on “Stanford Prison Experiment: Power effect on human behavior”

Leave a Reply

Your email address will not be published. Required fields are marked *